As long as you are quit, you are always welcome.
However, to play on our equipment, you do have to post roll. We've been lenient tonight as you are still acclimating yourself, but please feel free to join us.
I look forward to our talks man!
Thanks so much and I will post roll but am not used to this older format of forum. Do you have a link for where I post roll? I do not care which one I post in, the numbers do not really matter to me: right now, I know that Friday will be 4 weeks but that's about it.
And I also formulated what I think is a better explanation of what I am trying to say and posted it in this article but I would like to include it here, in case folks don't want to link to it, if it is alright with the mods here. If not, feel free to edit the post as you see fit.
I'm not saying you guys are wrong or trying to start a problem, I am legitemately trying to help. I think this is a really crucial issue in our world today and something we have all been decieved on. I am right now entertaining the idea of doing some research and writing a definitive article of my inital hypothesis, which I will post to my blog. If/when I do, I will let your this community know. I am totally open to the fact that I may be wrong but this hypothesis of mine has been being formed over the past 15 years and after watching a lot of folks I know die from substance abuse. And I'm sorry, but this model that we have now (and they are all very similar, 1,2,3, repeat) they simply do not work. And I think instead of blindly defending that to the death because we don't know what else may be out there, I think we should at least take a moment to see if neural pathways are actually permement (they're not, but, alas, I do not have alink for that article at the moment.) But I will try and organize that article and it will include that article in the footnotes.
Either way, it adds to my fantastical list of things to get done. LOL
So, Wastepanel responded to a post I made on that other Hoffman article and you can read his response there (I won't explain his response here):
http://www.quit4today.com/blog/2014/02/ ... omment-356And this was my response for those who do not wish to go to that article:
The very fact that you state you 'thought you were cured' is what my theory is about. You were still addicted to tobacco. It's not what we consciously think but what our SUBCONCSIOUS thinks. You relapsed, why? U said it had been 3 years. So my point is supported: time, at least as we physicially measure it, does not apply.
U say it did not take long and you were back to using worse in 4 months. My theory says that in those 4 months, you were still aware that you were now using tobacco more frequently than you had in the past 3 years. If you still felt cured and that it was fine to use, then you were lying to yourself and that led to your using again.
For me, 2011 marked when you realized what addiction's reach could do, when given control. It does not mean that control was always there. It was gone for 3 years. Perhaps the temptation existed and that may be indicative of the level of 'quit' you were at (you were not at that time fully free from a tobacco addiction though it seemed you were.) But the addiction had no control at that time. It was in the shadows.
What I am talking about is ousting it from the shadows forever. As long as we believe that is impossible, it is. If we believe that it is possible, than it is possible. Does not mean that any specific amount of time could achieve that: could take 6 weeks, 6 years or never happen.
What I am saying is that I believe it is possible and should be what we are working towards, not simply the stage where we're keeping the addiction in the shadows because we watch really closely and vigilantly every day. I'm saying the victory is when the addiction has been slain because all the shadows he had to hide in have been removed. In my hypothesis, these 'shadows' are deeper problems and issues we have to deal with that modern psychology and treatment simply fails to address, whether it be purposefully or negligently.
In my theory, the 'quit' which killthecan.org is where the addiction is in the shadows (the quit, the remission) and this is good. Now we learn how to live without the crutch of our using. But the 'quit' is no type of victory and offers no such victory: the 'quit' is the post, the watch, the training, the rehab, the transition. The 'cure' is the goal. And it is possible. It is not something you consciously recognize, which is what you mistook my theory for. If you consciously feel 'cured', that is the addiction telling a lie from the shadows so that you might release him from the shadows because you are fooled that he is left. His second lie to you is that you can never get rid of him, that he will always be there.
And that is where my theory comes in: that that is a simple lie: remove his shadows and he will no longer be there. And he can be ousted forever. And you can let down your vigil because there will no longer be a prisoner to keep watch over. Then, you can live your life free from the use of tobacco and the horrible addiction that goes along with it.
--end post---
I re read that and wanted to add a point for clarity:
what I am trying to say is that 'feeling' cured or 'i got this' is NOT the same as actually 'being' cured. The old way of thinking purports that the latter is simply not possible and does not exist. My theory challenges this idea in that I believe the latter is possible, attainable and should be the victory fought for.
I do not believe that there is a specific time frame for being fully cured. I believe it is more about personal growth and maturity. And I also do not think we will be conscious of it. I think it is more of a natural thing. Sort of like true love. It can never be forced. A quit can be forced. A cure cannot.
Hoffman Article