I met someone at a friends house yesterday who had quit smoking 6 years ago and yet he still uses nic gum every day. I didn't ask any specifics on the amount of his use, it really doesn't matter, just the fact that he traded one form of the drug for another is what struck me as completely hosed up. I used nic gum for the 2 weeks before my quit and I recall reading in the info packet that came with it that they recommended using it for 12 weeks before completely tapering off.
12 weeks? That's plenty of time to form a new habit. This company is just as dependent on the nicotine addiction as tobacco companies and yet they completely avoid any negative publicity b/c they are there to "help" smokers/dippers quit.Â
What complete BS...
Excellent post Leahy.
I'm with you on this one, as are most of the guys here. That's why we're a 100% No NRT's.
I don't know if it's true, but I wouldn't be surprised if you found people like the big tobacco companies investing strong in NRT's and other nicotine supplements.
But you are dead on...12 weeks before you quit...is BS.
I have to agree with you on this one NOLAQ.
Right now American tobacco is trying to play the snus card. Which will not work for them because their so called "snus" is just a dried out version of dip with a lot of sugar added. They are tiny little pouches that people will start to use but once their nicotine tolerance builds they will turn to dip and cigarettes. The perfect plan for creating more smokers and dippers. Except for the fact that the stuff is appalling and being a former snus user I have seen some of the numbers and it doesn't look good for big tobacco.
So what happens when the whole snus thing implodes on them... only two things will work.
1. Start making snus the way Swedes do or team up with them and import their products
2. "NRT" that mimics candy to draw in new users
Or American Big Tobacco will buy them out like Phillip Morris buying UST
NRT that mimics candy...like cherry, apple and those other flavors of Skoal that attract children and women-folk.
Tobacco companies are evil, pure and simple. Up to the same old tricks.
Tobacco companies evil??? Maybe. They certainly operate within an interesting environment. I fault the Federal Govt at least as much. Big tobacco is motivated by profit for it's shareholders, a fundamentally sound motivator, whereas the Govt is profiting from this product and yet forcing the companies to warn consumers not to use it....huh??? WTF? The govt talking out of both sides of their mouth.
Doesn't the govt actually profit more, per pack of cigarettes in the form of tax, than the tobacco companies make? Wow! That's quite a business arrangement. The Fed has NO exposure to liability for a product that kills millions of its citizens, a product that same govt profits from. Oh, and let's not forget the govt (granted it was the states) also were successful in suing big tobacco for billions of their profits for medical costs. ERRRR, isn't that money just coming from the opposite side of the balance sheet.
Isn't the Fed just a business partner of Big tobacco???
Here's a question for you...At what point does this business become the responsibility of the govt? The tax on the product continues to increase...isn't there a point at which the govt essentially owns it.
If it looks like shit, and smells like shit, and tastes like shit, then....it's probably shit!!!